JCHI vs. CNXT
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT).
JCHI and CNXT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JCHI is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 15, 2023. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014.
Performance
JCHI vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JCHI vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | -4.46% | 27.66% | 13.77% | -17.06% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 3.20% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -20.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 3.20% return.
JCHI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -4.46%
- 6M
- -11.12%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JCHI vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JCHI and CNXT have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
JCHI vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
JCHI
CNXT
JCHI vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCHI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 2.06 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 2.57 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 3.71 | -3.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 13.62 | -11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCHI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 2.06 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between JCHI and CNXT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JCHI vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than CNXT's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 1.89% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
JCHI vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and CNXT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCHI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -68.98% | +39.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -17.35% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.98% | -24.37% | +12.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -43.41% | +29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 4.73% | +0.91% |
Volatility
JCHI vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is 5.77%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that JCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JCHI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 7.46% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 19.80% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.80% | 31.89% | -11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 34.92% | -9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 31.54% | -6.38% |