JCHI vs. CNYA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both China Equities funds. JCHI is actively managed, while CNYA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JCHI returned 9.46%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for CNYA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.

Performance

JCHI vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 9.25% return.

JCHI

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 9.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNYA

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 39.08%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: -0.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	2.43%	27.66%	13.77%	-17.06%
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	9.25%	26.48%	10.78%	-15.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and CNYA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023	0.81

The correlation between JCHI and CNYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

JCHI vs. CNYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JCHI	CNYA
Consumer Cyclical	20.6%	5.7%
Financial Services	20.6%	17.0%
Technology	14.7%	30.0%
Communication Services	14.5%	0.6%
Industrials	10.7%	18.3%
Basic Materials	6.7%	10.6%
Healthcare	4.7%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	6.7%
Energy	3.3%	3.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 31
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CNYA

CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 73
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JCHI	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.27	-1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	3.10	-1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	5.18	-3.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	15.37	-11.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JCHI vs. CNYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and CNYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCHI	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	2.27	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.28	0.00

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and CNYA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	CNYA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-49.49%	+19.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-7.59%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-33.35%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	-13.45%	+7.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-20.69%	+7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.89%	2.56%	+3.33%

Volatility

JCHI vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is 6.02%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that JCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	CNYA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	6.44%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	12.32%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	17.32%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.87%	23.81%	+1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	23.56%	+1.31%

JCHI vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than CNYA's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	1.75%	1.92%	2.51%	4.23%	2.69%	1.11%	1.06%	1.21%	3.92%	0.97%	1.38%
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.77%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and CNYA in my portfolio?

JCHI and CNYA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JCHI or CNYA?

CNYA has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to JCHI (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs CNYA's -49.49%.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or CNYA?

On 3-year performance, CNYA leads with 10.99% vs 9.46% for JCHI. On fees, CNYA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCHI or CNYA?

Over the 3-year period, CNYA has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or CNYA?

CNYA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or CNYA?

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.75% for CNYA.

What is the main difference between JCHI and CNYA?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.60% for CNYA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.