JANM vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JANM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. JANM is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past year, JANM returned 7.85% vs 25.06% for CIBR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

JANM vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANM achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.16% return.

JANM

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 6M: 3.20%
• 1Y: 7.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 27.98%
• YTD: 27.16%
• 6M: 21.95%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 27.82%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 18.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANM vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January	2.54%	5.73%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	27.16%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JANM and CIBR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.56

The correlation between JANM and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANM vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANM

JANM Risk / Return Rank: 93
JANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JANM Omega Ratio Rank: 96
JANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
JANM Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 27
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANM vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	1.03	+2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.32	1.53	+3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.19	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	1.14	+3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.59	2.71	+22.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JANM vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANM Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANM and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	1.03	+2.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.12	0.66	+1.46

Drawdowns

JANM vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANM drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANM and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANM	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-33.89%	+31.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.70%	-21.99%	+20.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-3.84%	+3.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-8.66%	+8.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	9.26%	-8.95%

Volatility

JANM vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) is 0.35%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that JANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANM	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	11.15%	-10.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.80%	20.93%	-19.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34%	24.50%	-22.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	24.95%	-22.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.88%	23.59%	-20.71%

JANM vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANM vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

JANM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANM and CIBR in my portfolio?

JANM and CIBR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANM or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to JANM (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANM dropped -2.83% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, JANM or CIBR?

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.06% vs 7.85% for JANM. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JANM has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANM or CIBR?

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANM or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JANM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANM or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for JANM.

What is the main difference between JANM and CIBR?

JANM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JANM and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.