JANM vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JANM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - JANM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. JANM is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past year, JANM returned 7.67% vs 106.69% for QCLN. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

JANM vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANM achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 46.37% return.

JANM

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 46.37%
• 6M: 38.49%
• 1Y: 106.69%
• 3Y*: 11.22%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: 17.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANM vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January	2.47%	6.18%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	46.37%	26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JANM and QCLN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025	0.60

The correlation between JANM and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANM vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANM

JANM Risk / Return Rank: 92
JANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JANM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JANM Martin Ratio Rank: 94

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 85
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANM vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANM	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.22	2.91	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	3.29	+1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.42	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	6.54	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.47	21.21	+3.26

JANM vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANM Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANM and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANM vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANM drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANM and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANM	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-76.18%	+73.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.70%	-16.40%	+14.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-24.38%	+24.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-43.40%	+43.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	5.05%	-4.74%

Volatility

JANM vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) is 0.73%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that JANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANM	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	16.78%	-16.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.92%	29.37%	-27.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39%	36.95%	-34.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.91%	38.45%	-35.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.91%	35.18%	-32.27%

JANM vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANM vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

JANM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANM and QCLN in my portfolio?

JANM and QCLN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANM or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to JANM (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANM dropped -2.83% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, JANM or QCLN?

On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 106.69% vs 7.67% for JANM. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, JANM has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANM or QCLN?

Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 106.69% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANM or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JANM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANM or QCLN?

QCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for JANM.

What is the main difference between JANM and QCLN?

JANM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JANM and 0.59% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.