JABAX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
JABAX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
JABAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T | -5.37% | 14.85% | 20.63% | 15.29% | -16.70% | 17.07% | 14.22% | 22.40% | 0.53% | 5.47% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -1.78% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABAX achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's -1.78% return.
JABAX
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
PALDX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 14.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JABAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JABAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
JABAX
PALDX
JABAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.26 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.86 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.82 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 8.67 | -3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.26 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.73 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABAX and PALDX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JABAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
JABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than PALDX's 5.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T | 8.71% | 8.67% | 11.71% | 2.15% | 1.83% | 4.38% | 2.41% | 2.76% | 6.95% | 4.59% | 3.28% | 6.18% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.52% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JABAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABAX drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, roughly equal to the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABAX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -26.16% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -8.20% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.60% | -20.47% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -4.16% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.16% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.72% | +0.33% |
Volatility
JABAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.74% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 6.16% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 11.65% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 12.11% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 12.76% | -1.57% |