JABAX vs. MEIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX).
JABAX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. MEIIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Feb 1, 1996.
Performance
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T | -6.87% | 14.85% | 20.63% | 15.29% | -16.70% | 17.07% | 14.22% | 22.40% | 0.53% | 17.68% |
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | -0.56% | 13.26% | 11.86% | 8.21% | -6.02% | 25.43% | 3.99% | 30.04% | -9.90% | 17.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABAX achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than MEIIX's -0.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JABAX having a 9.67% annualized return and MEIIX not far ahead at 9.72%.
JABAX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
MEIIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JABAX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank
JABAX
MEIIX
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABAX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.77 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 3.43 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABAX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.56 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABAX and MEIIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison
JABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, less than MEIIX's 9.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T | 8.85% | 8.67% | 11.71% | 2.15% | 1.83% | 4.38% | 2.41% | 2.76% | 6.95% | 4.59% | 3.28% | 6.18% |
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 9.77% | 9.52% | 9.30% | 8.41% | 7.58% | 3.32% | 2.63% | 3.17% | 3.62% | 4.04% | 2.91% | 5.97% |
Drawdowns
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABAX drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, smaller than the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABAX and MEIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABAX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -52.64% | +26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -11.10% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.60% | -17.58% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.50% | -36.70% | +14.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.14% | -6.55% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -6.58% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.51% | -0.51% |
Volatility
JABAX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 3.11%. This indicates that JABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABAX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 3.11% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 7.68% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 14.78% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.29% | 13.90% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 16.55% | -5.37% |