IYT vs. XLB
IYT (iShares Transportation Average ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYT is a Transportation Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYT returned 11.08%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for XLB. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
IYT vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYT having a 11.08% annualized return and XLB not far behind at 10.54%.
IYT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
XLB
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
IYT vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 16.53% | 11.48% | 4.10% | 24.62% | -21.74% | 26.41% | 14.20% | 20.11% | -12.87% | 18.89% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 15.57% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYT and XLB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IYT and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYT vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYT
XLB
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
IYT
XLB
Technology
IYT
XLB
-
Basic Materials
IYT
-
XLB
Communication Services
IYT
-
XLB
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYT
-
XLB
Consumer Defensive
IYT
-
XLB
-
Energy
IYT
-
XLB
-
Financial Services
IYT
-
XLB
-
Healthcare
IYT
-
XLB
-
Real Estate
IYT
-
XLB
-
Utilities
IYT
-
XLB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYT vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
IYT
XLB
IYT vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.65 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 5.05 | +3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYT vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.39% | -59.83% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -12.38% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -23.17% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -24.72% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.28% | -37.27% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.25% | +2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -10.83% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.04% | -0.33% |
Volatility
IYT vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) is 6.45%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that IYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 7.05% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 13.58% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 17.49% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 19.06% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 20.70% | +2.48% |
IYT vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYT vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XLB's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 1.28% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.68% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYT and XLB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to IYT (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 10-year performance, IYT leads with 11.08% vs 10.54% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYT has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.93% for IYT.
IYT is categorized as Transportation Equities, while XLB is Materials. IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.13% for XLB.
IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYT and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer