PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYT vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYT vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYT having a 11.08% annualized return and XLB not far behind at 10.54%.


IYT

1D
0.45%
1M
7.88%
YTD
16.53%
6M
13.90%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
11.08%

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.99%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYT vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
16.53%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%20.11%-12.87%18.89%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IYT and XLB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003

0.72

The correlation between IYT and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYT vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYT
XLB

Industrials

84.4%
1.5%

Technology

15.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

87.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

IYT
84.4%
XLB
1.5%

Technology

IYT
15.6%
XLB

-

Basic Materials

IYT

-

XLB
87.3%

Communication Services

IYT

-

XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYT

-

XLB
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

IYT

-

XLB

-

Energy

IYT

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

IYT

-

XLB

-

Healthcare

IYT

-

XLB

-

Real Estate

IYT

-

XLB

-

Utilities

IYT

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYT vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYT vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYTXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.65

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

5.05

+3.51

IYT vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYT and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYT vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYTXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-59.83%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-12.38%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-23.17%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-24.72%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-37.27%

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.25%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-10.83%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

4.04%

-0.33%

Volatility

IYT vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) is 6.45%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that IYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYTXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

7.05%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

13.58%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

17.49%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

19.06%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

20.70%

+2.48%

IYT vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYT vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XLB's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.93%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYT and XLB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to IYT (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, IYT leads with 11.08% vs 10.54% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYT has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.

XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.93% for IYT.

IYT is categorized as Transportation Equities, while XLB is Materials. IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.13% for XLB.

IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYT and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer