IYRI vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. IYRI is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 10.79% vs 24.71% for RYLD. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

IYRI vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 14.18% return.

IYRI

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 7.99%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 1Y: 10.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

RYLD

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.90%
• 6M: 11.01%
• YTD: 14.18%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF	$3.36M	$3.54M	$3.80M
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.56M	$9.60M	$9.13M

IYRI vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF	9.43%	6.99%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	14.18%	5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and RYLD is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.40

The correlation between IYRI and RYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IYRI vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYRI

IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 38
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYRI vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IYRI	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	2.38	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	3.34	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.50	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	3.94	-2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	16.16	-10.91

IYRI vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IYRI	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-41.53%	+29.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-6.29%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	0.00%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-8.64%	+7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.53%	+0.53%

Volatility

IYRI vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.34%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IYRI	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	2.34%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.10%	7.72%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	10.57%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	13.98%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.98%	17.04%	-4.06%

IYRI vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYRI vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, less than RYLD's 11.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF	10.84%	11.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.43%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IYRI and RYLD in my portfolio?

IYRI and RYLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IYRI or RYLD?

IYRI has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to RYLD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, IYRI or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 24.71% vs 10.79% for IYRI. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IYRI or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 24.71% return vs 10.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IYRI or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IYRI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IYRI or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.43%, compared with 10.84% for IYRI.

What is the main difference between IYRI and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.