IYRI vs. RNTY
IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. IYRI is passively managed, while RNTY is actively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 8.34% vs 8.01% for RNTY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RNTY.
Performance
IYRI vs. RNTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than RNTY's 6.19% return.
IYRI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNTY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI vs. RNTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 4.08% | 7.14% |
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF | 6.19% | 4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYRI and RNTY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IYRI and RNTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYRI vs. RNTY — Risk / Return Rank
IYRI
RNTY
IYRI vs. RNTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYRI | RNTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.76 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.02 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 3.40 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYRI | RNTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.76 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.87 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
IYRI vs. RNTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, which is greater than RNTY's maximum drawdown of -7.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and RNTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYRI | RNTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -7.91% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -7.91% | +0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -2.12% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -1.76% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.36% | -0.27% |
Volatility
IYRI vs. RNTY - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) at 2.87%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYRI | RNTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 2.87% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 7.81% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 10.61% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 10.75% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 10.75% | +2.32% |
IYRI vs. RNTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RNTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYRI vs. RNTY - Dividend Comparison
IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, less than RNTY's 13.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 11.27% | 11.72% |
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF | 13.30% | 8.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYRI and RNTY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYRI has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to RNTY (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs RNTY's -7.91%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 8.34% vs 8.01% for RNTY. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 8.34% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.
RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 13.30%, compared with 11.27% for IYRI.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.99% for RNTY.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYRI and RNTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer