PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYRI vs. RLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYRI vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly lower than RLTY's 9.86% return.


IYRI

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.23%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RLTY

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
9.86%
6M
12.15%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYRI vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and RLTY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.72

The correlation between IYRI and RLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYRI vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYRI
IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

RLTY
RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYRI vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYRIRLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.06

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

3.52

+0.94

IYRI vs. RLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and RLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum RLTY drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and RLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRIRLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-35.44%

+23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-11.40%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.72%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-13.61%

+11.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.43%

-1.33%

Volatility

IYRI vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 3.55%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRIRLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.55%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

10.29%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

13.34%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

22.66%

-9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

22.66%

-9.46%

Dividends

IYRI vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than RLTY's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
12.08%11.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.53%8.98%8.93%9.18%6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYRI and RLTY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYRI has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to RLTY (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs RLTY's -35.44%.

RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYRI and RLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer