PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. KBWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYG vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has outperformed KBWB with an annualized return of 13.56%, while KBWB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


IYG

1D
2.82%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
13.56%

KBWB

1D
3.65%
1M
4.78%
YTD
7.86%
6M
11.77%
1Y
40.56%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-3.88%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
7.86%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and KBWB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.94

The correlation between IYG and KBWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYG vs. KBWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYG
KBWB

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IYG
100.0%
KBWB
100.0%

Basic Materials

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Communication Services

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Consumer Defensive

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Energy

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Healthcare

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Industrials

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Real Estate

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Technology

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Utilities

IYG

-

KBWB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGKBWBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.49

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

7.82

-6.31

IYG vs. KBWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the KBWB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and KBWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGKBWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.01

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.32

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.42

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.51

-0.28

Drawdowns

IYG vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than KBWB's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and KBWB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGKBWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-50.27%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-16.38%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-25.43%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-49.31%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-50.27%

+5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

0.00%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-11.74%

-9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

5.20%

+0.91%

Volatility

IYG vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) is 4.41%, while Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that IYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYGKBWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

6.16%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

15.88%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

20.34%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

26.67%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

29.21%

-5.67%

IYG vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYG vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than KBWB's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.11%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
1.99%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYG and KBWB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWB has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to IYG (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs KBWB's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.56% vs 12.35% for KBWB. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.11% for IYG.

IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.35% for KBWB.

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and KBWB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer