PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. SAIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. SAIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than SAIC's 19.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has outperformed SAIC with an annualized return of 9.38%, while SAIC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.52% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.75%
6M
5.78%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.38%
ALL TIME*
7.79%

SAIC

1D
2.14%
1M
11.95%
6M
8.81%
YTD
19.45%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
1.52%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
8.52%
ALL TIME*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$117.94M$164.49M$177.55M
$49.96M$54.61M$59.26M

IXUS vs. SAIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
11.53%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
19.45%-8.73%-9.04%13.58%34.95%-10.20%10.81%39.15%-15.48%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and SAIC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IXUS and SAIC has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. SAIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SAIC
SAIC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SAIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SAIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. SAIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXUSSAICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.16

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

0.29

+6.84

IXUS vs. SAIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the SAIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and SAIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. SAIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum SAIC drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and SAIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSSAICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-45.92%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-31.34%

+19.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-45.74%

+31.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-45.74%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-45.92%

+9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-20.91%

+16.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-12.72%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

17.10%

-14.04%

Volatility

IXUS vs. SAIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is 4.62%, while Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that IXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSSAICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

10.65%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

30.83%

-15.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

39.72%

-22.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

30.41%

-13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

32.68%

-15.74%

Dividends

IXUS vs. SAIC - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than SAIC's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
3.01%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.24%1.47%1.32%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and SAIC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAIC has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to IXUS (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs SAIC's -45.92%.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and SAIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer