IXN vs. GXPT
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IXN tracks the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IXN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
IXN vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 32.88% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.
IXN
- 1D
- -5.33%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 32.88%
- 6M
- 32.08%
- 1Y
- 59.88%
- 3Y*
- 32.94%
- 5Y*
- 20.94%
- 10Y*
- 25.29%
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXN vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 32.88% | 12.40% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and GXPT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXN vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXN | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXN vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -18.74% | -36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -8.72% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -5.04% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | — | — |
Volatility
IXN vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.21% | 22.91% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 22.91% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 22.91% | +1.76% |
IXN vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXN vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.79% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IXN and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for IXN and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer