PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 40.36% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 28.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXN having a 25.98% annualized return and VGT not far behind at 25.96%.


IXN

1D
0.59%
1M
8.90%
YTD
40.36%
6M
40.73%
1Y
70.75%
3Y*
35.39%
5Y*
22.48%
10Y*
25.98%

VGT

1D
0.39%
1M
4.11%
YTD
28.03%
6M
26.85%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
40.36%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and VGT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.95

The correlation between IXN and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXN vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
VGT

Technology

99.3%
98.5%

Industrials

0.1%
0.4%

Energy

0.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IXN
99.3%
VGT
98.5%

Industrials

IXN
0.1%
VGT
0.4%

Energy

IXN
0.1%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

IXN

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

IXN

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

VGT

-

Financial Services

IXN

-

VGT
0.5%

Utilities

IXN

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXNVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

3.31

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

10.16

+6.54

IXN vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-54.63%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-16.40%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-27.23%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-35.07%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-35.07%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-4.18%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-7.95%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

5.34%

-1.09%

Volatility

IXN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 10.66%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.73%

10.66%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.80%

18.19%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

22.44%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

25.50%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

24.78%

-0.12%

IXN vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.74%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IXN and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IXN has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to VGT (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.98% vs 25.96% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.98% return vs 25.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.

IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.09% for VGT.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer