PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 19.57%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.


IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and VUG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.97

The correlation between IWY and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWY vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
VUG

Technology

54.9%
53.5%

Communication Services

13.9%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
12.2%

Healthcare

6.6%
4.6%

Financial Services

5.6%
4.3%

Industrials

4.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
1.5%

Utilities

1.1%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.6%

Energy

0.0%
0.4%

Technology

IWY
54.9%
VUG
53.5%

Communication Services

IWY
13.9%
VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
11.4%
VUG
12.2%

Healthcare

IWY
6.6%
VUG
4.6%

Financial Services

IWY
5.6%
VUG
4.3%

Industrials

IWY
4.0%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
3.0%
VUG
1.5%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
VUG
0.6%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
VUG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWYVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.69

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

5.92

-0.67

IWY vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWYVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.68

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.62

+0.30

Drawdowns

IWY vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-50.68%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-16.53%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-22.85%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-35.61%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-35.61%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.51%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-7.09%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.71%

+0.38%

Volatility

IWY vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.83%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

12.11%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

15.84%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

22.22%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

21.44%

-0.47%

IWY vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IWY and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.57% vs 18.26% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer