IWY vs. ROUS
IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IWY tracks the Russell Top 200 Growth Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWY returned 19.57%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ROUS. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
IWY vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 19.57%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.
IWY
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
IWY vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 7.20% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWY and ROUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IWY and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWY vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWY
ROUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IWY
ROUS
Communication Services
IWY
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
IWY
ROUS
Healthcare
IWY
ROUS
Financial Services
IWY
ROUS
Industrials
IWY
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
IWY
ROUS
Utilities
IWY
ROUS
Real Estate
IWY
ROUS
Basic Materials
IWY
ROUS
Energy
IWY
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWY vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
IWY
ROUS
IWY vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 4.95 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 20.38 | -15.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.60 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.90 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.77 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.67 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
IWY vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -35.51% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -5.97% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -15.81% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.68% | -18.91% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.68% | -35.51% | +2.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | 0.00% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -4.24% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 1.45% | +3.64% |
Volatility
IWY vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 2.54% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 8.50% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 11.37% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 14.38% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 16.96% | +4.01% |
IWY vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWY vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWY and ROUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.57% vs 13.01% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.
IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWY and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer