PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWX vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWX vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.38%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.


IWX

1D
1.25%
1M
2.38%
YTD
16.33%
6M
15.40%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.38%

MGV

1D
1.49%
1M
4.52%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.46%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWX vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
16.33%18.23%14.89%10.45%-5.33%23.33%1.46%25.82%-6.53%14.05%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
17.55%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IWX and MGV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.95

The correlation between IWX and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWX vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWX
MGV

Financial Services

20.6%
22.8%

Technology

18.5%
18.5%

Healthcare

12.1%
16.0%

Industrials

10.8%
13.2%

Communication Services

10.5%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
3.4%

Energy

5.8%
6.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.3%

Utilities

2.9%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.2%

Financial Services

IWX
20.6%
MGV
22.8%

Technology

IWX
18.5%
MGV
18.5%

Healthcare

IWX
12.1%
MGV
16.0%

Industrials

IWX
10.8%
MGV
13.2%

Communication Services

IWX
10.5%
MGV
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWX
7.6%
MGV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWX
6.5%
MGV
3.4%

Energy

IWX
5.8%
MGV
6.0%

Basic Materials

IWX
2.9%
MGV
2.3%

Utilities

IWX
2.9%
MGV
2.3%

Real Estate

IWX
1.8%
MGV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWX vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWX vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWXMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.53

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

4.66

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.23

17.69

+1.54

IWX vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWX and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWX vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWXMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-56.07%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-6.42%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-13.18%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-16.54%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-35.41%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-7.77%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.69%

-0.14%

Volatility

IWX vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.67%. This indicates that IWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWXMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.67%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

7.92%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

10.23%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

13.59%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

16.32%

+0.18%

IWX vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWX vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than MGV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.45%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IWX and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to MGV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs MGV's -56.07%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.69% vs 12.38% for IWX. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWX.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.45% for IWX.

IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWX and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer