IWX vs. IWY
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Value Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.84%/yr vs 19.41%/yr for IWY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IWX vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 11.84%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.41% annualized return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 30.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
IWY
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
IWX vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 15.73% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 4.44% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and IWY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IWX and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWX vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
IWY
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
IWY
Technology
IWX
IWY
Healthcare
IWX
IWY
Industrials
IWX
IWY
Communication Services
IWX
IWY
Consumer Defensive
IWX
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
IWY
Energy
IWX
IWY
Basic Materials
IWX
IWY
Utilities
IWX
IWY
Real Estate
IWX
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
IWY
IWX vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.25 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 1.39 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.97 | 4.46 | +15.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWX vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -32.68% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -16.63% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -23.22% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -32.68% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -32.68% | -3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -4.35% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -4.75% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 5.19% | -3.64% |
Volatility
IWX vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 3.90%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 5.92% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.20% | 12.65% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 16.17% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 21.58% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 21.03% | -4.49% |
IWX vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWX and IWY have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than IWY's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and IWY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWY has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to IWX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.41% vs 11.84% for IWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX and IWY have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.35% for IWY.
IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer