PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWV vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWV vs. SPTM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IWV tracks the Russell 3000 Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.47%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

IWV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWV having a 10.30% return and SPTM slightly higher at 10.61%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWV having a 14.47% annualized return and SPTM not far ahead at 14.86%.

IWV

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.09%
6M
8.66%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
14.47%
ALL TIME*
8.56%

SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

IWV

iShares Russell 3000 ETF
$79.44M$75.17M$98.92M

SPTM

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M

IWV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		10.30%16.96%23.49%25.82%-19.28%25.54%20.55%30.66%-5.43%20.97%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF		10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IWV and SPTM is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2000

0.94

The correlation between IWV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWV
SPTM

Technology

35.7%
36.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.5%

Industrials

9.9%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.3%

Communication Services

9.3%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.5%

Energy

3.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.2%

Technology

IWV
35.7%
SPTM
36.3%

Financial Services

IWV
12.0%
SPTM
12.5%

Industrials

IWV
9.9%
SPTM
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWV
9.6%
SPTM
9.1%

Healthcare

IWV
9.6%
SPTM
9.3%

Communication Services

IWV
9.3%
SPTM
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

IWV
4.3%
SPTM
4.5%

Energy

IWV
3.2%
SPTM
3.5%

Real Estate

IWV
2.3%
SPTM
2.3%

Utilities

IWV
2.2%
SPTM
2.6%

Basic Materials

IWV
2.0%
SPTM
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Often compared with IWV:
IWV vs. SPYIWV vs. VTIIWV vs. IWMIWV vs. ACWXIWV vs. VTHRIWV vs. IVVIWV vs. RSP
Often compared with SPTM:
SPTM vs. VTISPTM vs. SPYSPTM vs. VOOSPTM vs. ITOTSPTM vs. SCHDSPTM vs. SCHGSPTM vs. BKLC

Return for Risk

IWV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
IWV
IWV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IWVSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
1.57

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.11
2.18

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.31

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

10.07

-0.54

IWV vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWV and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and SPTM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWVSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-54.80%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.68%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-18.87%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-24.14%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.22%

-34.66%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.11%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-9.00%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.99%

+0.06%

Volatility

IWV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWVSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.50%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

10.02%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

12.81%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.97%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

18.03%

+0.37%

IWV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		0.88%0.96%1.08%1.30%1.56%1.04%1.30%1.69%1.97%1.58%1.79%1.99%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF		1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, IWV and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTM has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to IWV (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 14.86% vs 14.47% for IWV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 14.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.88% for IWV.

IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWV and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer