IWV vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.85%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

IWV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.85%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.

IWV

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: 22.07%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: 14.85%

DGRO

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 6M: 9.87%
• 1Y: 23.89%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF	11.36%	16.96%	23.49%	25.82%	-19.28%	25.54%	20.55%	30.66%	-5.43%	20.97%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	9.64%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IWV and DGRO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.90

The correlation between IWV and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWV vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWV	DGRO
Technology	33.1%	19.4%
Financial Services	12.2%	21.2%
Communication Services	10.5%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	5.7%
Industrials	9.6%	10.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	11.5%
Energy	3.8%	5.6%
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Utilities	2.3%	6.9%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.5%

Return for Risk

IWV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWV

IWV Risk / Return Rank: 72
IWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IWV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
IWV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 78
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWV	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.53	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.68	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.46	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.71	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.64	14.33	+0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWV vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWV and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWV	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.53	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.78	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.81	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.77	-0.32

Drawdowns

IWV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWV	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.61%	-35.10%	-20.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.47%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.28%	-14.03%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-19.31%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.22%	-35.10%	-0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.59%	-3.44%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.67%	+0.26%

Volatility

IWV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that IWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWV	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.24%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	6.94%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	9.49%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.24%	13.82%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	16.62%	+1.78%

IWV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.94%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF	0.85%	0.96%	1.08%	1.30%	1.56%	1.04%	1.30%	1.69%	1.97%	1.58%	1.79%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWV and DGRO in my portfolio?

IWV and DGRO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWV or DGRO?

IWV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, IWV or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.85% vs 13.34% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWV or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWV or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWV or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.85% for IWV.

What is the main difference between IWV and DGRO?

IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.