IWS vs. ET
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.51%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IWS vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 10.51%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
IWS vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and ET is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IWS and ET has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
ET
IWS vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWS | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.13 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.22 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 2.70 | +11.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWS vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -87.81% | +25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -9.38% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -24.56% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -25.82% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -72.82% | +28.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.47% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -25.72% | +17.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 4.65% | -2.65% |
Volatility
IWS vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 4.29%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 5.08% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 12.03% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 16.13% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 24.86% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 34.99% | -15.62% |
Dividends
IWS vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and ET have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ET has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs ET's -87.81%.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer