IWR vs. NBIS
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock. Over the past year, IWR returned 21.77% vs 362.13% for NBIS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IWR vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 177.59% return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
NBIS
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 177.59%
- 6M
- 164.98%
- 1Y
- 362.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWR vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 13.23% | 10.37% | -1.15% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 177.59% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and NBIS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
NBIS
IWR vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWR | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 8.03 | -5.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.26 | 18.34 | -8.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWR vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -58.27% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -45.47% | +37.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.15% | +12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -18.94% | +11.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 19.86% | -17.73% |
Volatility
IWR vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 4.49%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.23%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 30.23% | -25.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 71.43% | -61.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 104.41% | -90.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 110.20% | -91.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 110.20% | -90.82% |
Dividends
IWR vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and NBIS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to IWR (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer