IWN vs. EFV

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.11%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for EFV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EFV.

Performance

IWN vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 12.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWN having a 10.11% annualized return and EFV not far ahead at 10.23%.

IWN

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 13.76%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 1Y: 37.49%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 10.11%
• ALL TIME*: 9.50%

EFV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.68%
• 6M: 8.90%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 20.66%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 10.23%
• ALL TIME*: 5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	22.65%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	12.03%	42.22%	5.35%	18.85%	-5.22%	11.08%	-2.97%	15.80%	-14.67%	21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and EFV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005	0.72

The correlation between IWN and EFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWN vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWN	EFV
Financial Services	28.4%	39.6%
Industrials	12.9%	9.6%
Real Estate	12.1%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	5.3%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.5%
Utilities	6.9%	5.9%
Energy	6.6%	6.6%
Technology	5.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	4.2%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	9.5%
Communication Services	1.6%	4.0%

Return for Risk

IWN vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 88
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EFV

EFV Risk / Return Rank: 80
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWN	EFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.06	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.88	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	2.74	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	10.04	+5.05

IWN vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWN vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and EFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWN	EFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-63.94%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-10.90%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-13.72%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	-25.84%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.08%	-43.16%	-2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-1.39%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-14.75%	+4.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.96%	-0.47%

Volatility

IWN vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWN	EFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	3.17%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.17%	12.15%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	14.48%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.26%	15.91%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	17.44%	+5.89%

IWN vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWN vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than EFV's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	4.69%	4.16%	4.66%	4.36%	4.17%	4.07%	2.42%	4.62%	4.56%	3.56%	3.28%	3.59%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.44%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWN and EFV in my portfolio?

IWN and EFV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWN or EFV?

EFV has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to IWN (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs EFV's -63.94%.

Which ETF is better, IWN or EFV?

On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.23% vs 10.11% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWN or EFV?

Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWN or EFV?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWN or EFV?

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.44% for IWN.

What is the main difference between IWN and EFV?

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.31% for EFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.