IWMI vs. ITWO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO).

IWMI and ITWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. ITWO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024.

Performance

IWMI vs. ITWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWMI vs. ITWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	0.93%	14.97%	3.69%
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	1.60%	14.25%	3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than ITWO's 1.60% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -4.05%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 4.83%
• 1Y: 25.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ITWO

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -4.05%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. ITWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ITWO's 0.55% expense ratio.

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

ITWO

Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. ITWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 78
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 84

ITWO

ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 66
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. ITWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWMI	ITWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.16	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.64	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.90	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	6.81	+2.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWMI vs. ITWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ITWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and ITWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWMI	ITWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.16	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.61	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and ITWO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IWMI vs. ITWO - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%, more than ITWO's 11.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.48%	14.05%	8.78%
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	11.67%	12.12%	4.11%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. ITWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ITWO drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and ITWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	ITWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-24.77%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-13.06%	+0.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.20%	-7.06%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-5.58%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	3.65%	-0.96%

Volatility

IWMI vs. ITWO - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) have volatilities of 7.03% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	ITWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.03%	7.26%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	14.55%	-2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	21.87%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	20.75%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	20.75%	-2.45%