IWMI vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. IWMI is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past year, IWMI returned 36.84% vs 26.47% for SCHD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

IWMI vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.44% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 6M: 17.45%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	17.41%	14.97%	6.58%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	18.44%	4.34%	6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and SCHD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.60

The correlation between IWMI and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWMI vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWMI	SCHD
Industrials	17.7%	7.4%
Technology	17.0%	19.4%
Healthcare	16.5%	18.4%
Financial Services	15.7%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	6.7%
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Energy	6.1%	14.6%
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.2%
Utilities	2.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	2.4%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	18.5%

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 86
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 87
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.41	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.67	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.43	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	5.76	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.15	13.87	+4.28

IWMI vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-33.37%	+9.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-4.61%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.87%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.31%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.91%	+0.12%

Volatility

IWMI vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.12%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	3.12%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	7.74%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	11.09%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.92%	14.36%	+3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	16.70%	+1.22%

IWMI vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMI vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.34%, more than SCHD's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	13.34%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.28%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and SCHD in my portfolio?

IWMI and SCHD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMI or SCHD?

IWMI has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SCHD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which ETF is better, IWMI or SCHD?

On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 36.84% vs 26.47% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMI or SCHD?

Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 36.84% return vs 26.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMI or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IWMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMI or SCHD?

IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 13.34%, compared with 3.28% for SCHD.

What is the main difference between IWMI and SCHD?

IWMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 0.06% for SCHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.