ITWO vs. RYLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITWO (Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and RYLG (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds - ITWO tracks the Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index while RYLG tracks the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ITWO returned 39.04% vs 29.67% for RYLG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ITWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RYLG.

Performance

ITWO vs. RYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITWO achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than RYLG's 12.45% return.

ITWO

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 39.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RYLG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 12.24%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 12.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWO vs. RYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	17.52%	14.25%	3.68%
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF	12.45%	9.39%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ITWO and RYLG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.96

The correlation between ITWO and RYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ITWO vs. RYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWO

ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 66
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RYLG

RYLG Risk / Return Rank: 64
RYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWO vs. RYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITWO	RYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.01	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.83	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	3.64	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	14.04	-0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITWO vs. RYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the RYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITWO and RYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITWO	RYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.01	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.63	+0.40

Drawdowns

ITWO vs. RYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than RYLG's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and RYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITWO	RYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.77%	-22.37%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-8.18%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.97%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-4.13%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.12%	+0.78%

Volatility

ITWO vs. RYLG - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) at 3.93%. This indicates that ITWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITWO	RYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	3.93%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	10.67%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.63%	14.88%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	17.17%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	17.17%	+3.31%

ITWO vs. RYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITWO vs. RYLG - Dividend Comparison

ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than RYLG's 10.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	7.58%	12.12%	4.11%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF	10.34%	10.82%	23.73%	5.78%	4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITWO and RYLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ITWO and RYLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ITWO or RYLG?

ITWO has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to RYLG (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITWO dropped -24.77% vs RYLG's -22.37%.

Which ETF is better, ITWO or RYLG?

On 1-year performance, ITWO leads with 39.04% vs 29.67% for RYLG. On fees, RYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITWO or RYLG?

Over the 1-year period, ITWO has performed better with a 39.04% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITWO or RYLG?

RYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ITWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITWO or RYLG?

RYLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.34%, compared with 7.58% for ITWO.

What is the main difference between ITWO and RYLG?

ITWO tracks Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index, while RYLG tracks Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ITWO and 0.35% for RYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.