ITWO vs. RYLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG).
ITWO and RYLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITWO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. RYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2022. Both ITWO and RYLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITWO vs. RYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITWO vs. RYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 2.68% | 14.25% | 3.68% |
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 1.14% | 9.39% | 5.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITWO achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than RYLG's 1.14% return.
ITWO
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYLG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITWO vs. RYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ITWO vs. RYLG — Risk / Return Rank
ITWO
RYLG
ITWO vs. RYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITWO | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.47 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 1.43 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 6.45 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITWO | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITWO and RYLG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ITWO vs. RYLG - Dividend Comparison
ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, which matches RYLG's 11.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 11.41% | 12.12% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 11.30% | 10.82% | 23.73% | 5.78% | 4.36% |
Drawdowns
ITWO vs. RYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than RYLG's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and RYLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITWO | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -22.37% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -13.18% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -5.28% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -4.29% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 2.92% | +0.75% |
Volatility
ITWO vs. RYLG - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) at 6.30%. This indicates that ITWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITWO | RYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.30% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 11.99% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 19.62% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 17.35% | +3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 17.35% | +3.39% |