IWMI vs. IPDP
Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP).
IWMI and IPDP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. IPDP is an actively managed fund by Innovative Portfolios. It was launched on Dec 24, 2018.
Performance
IWMI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWMI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | -4.52% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
IWMI
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWMI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWMI vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank
IWMI
IPDP
IWMI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Dividends
IWMI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.48% | 14.05% | 8.78% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IWMI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and IPDP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | 0.00% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | 0.00% | -5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | 0.00% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility
IWMI vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWMI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.11% | 0.00% | +19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 0.00% | +18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 0.00% | +18.30% |