IWLG vs. PFM
IWLG (NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IWLG is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IWLG returned 23.06%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for PFM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWLG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
IWLG vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWLG achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 3.24% return.
IWLG
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- -3.87%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFM
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
IWLG vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF | -3.87% | 14.73% | 31.47% | 43.25% | -0.01% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.24% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWLG and PFM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IWLG and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWLG vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
IWLG
PFM
IWLG vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.11 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 3.08 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.61 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 14.43 | -10.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.11 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.51 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
IWLG vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWLG drawdown since its inception was -23.19%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWLG and PFM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -53.21% | +30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -7.09% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -1.81% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -6.99% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 1.77% | +4.43% |
Volatility
IWLG vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 4.18%. This indicates that IWLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWLG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 4.18% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 7.42% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 10.67% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 13.59% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 15.22% | +5.91% |
IWLG vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWLG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWLG vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
IWLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.40% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |