IWLG vs. RFDA
IWLG (NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IWLG returned 23.06%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for RFDA. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWLG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.
Performance
IWLG vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWLG achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 3.58% return.
IWLG
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- -3.87%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFDA
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IWLG vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF | -3.87% | 14.73% | 31.47% | 43.25% | -0.01% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 3.58% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWLG and RFDA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IWLG and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWLG vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
IWLG
RFDA
IWLG vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWLG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.61 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 3.64 | -1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.49 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 6.72 | -5.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 23.79 | -19.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWLG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.61 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.75 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
IWLG vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWLG drawdown since its inception was -23.19%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWLG and RFDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWLG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -34.60% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -5.45% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | 0.00% | -8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -3.79% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 1.54% | +4.66% |
Volatility
IWLG vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 4.18%. This indicates that IWLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWLG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 4.18% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 8.63% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 12.65% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 15.73% | +5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 16.91% | +4.22% |
IWLG vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWLG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWLG vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
IWLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.90% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |