IWL vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
IWL and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IWL and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWL or XLK.
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and XLK is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWL:
2.04
XLK:
0.98
IWL:
2.71
XLK:
1.40
IWL:
1.38
XLK:
1.19
IWL:
2.98
XLK:
1.28
IWL:
13.47
XLK:
4.39
IWL:
2.00%
XLK:
4.94%
IWL:
13.19%
XLK:
22.10%
IWL:
-32.71%
XLK:
-82.05%
IWL:
-3.39%
XLK:
-3.81%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 21.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 13.77%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.28% annualized return.
IWL
26.94%
0.00%
8.38%
28.80%
15.66%
13.77%
XLK
21.29%
1.22%
0.72%
21.22%
21.76%
20.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWL vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than XLK's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.53% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.68% | 1.82% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.49% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 3.79%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.