PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWL vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWL vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 10.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 15.89%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.06% annualized return.


IWL

1D
0.87%
1M
0.06%
6M
7.61%
YTD
8.65%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
15.89%
ALL TIME*
14.62%

IUSG

1D
1.37%
1M
-0.25%
6M
9.46%
YTD
10.32%
1Y
21.76%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
17.06%
ALL TIME*
8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$108.31M$93.20M$100.12M
$7.92M$7.26M$9.02M

IWL vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
8.65%19.09%27.12%29.77%-19.89%27.79%22.10%31.42%-3.30%22.90%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
10.32%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and IUSG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.91

The correlation between IWL and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWL vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWL
IUSG

Technology

40.8%
50.9%

Financial Services

12.2%
8.6%

Communication Services

10.5%
14.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
8.5%

Industrials

7.2%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.0%

Energy

2.7%
0.2%

Utilities

1.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Technology

IWL
40.8%
IUSG
50.9%

Financial Services

IWL
12.2%
IUSG
8.6%

Communication Services

IWL
10.5%
IUSG
14.9%

Healthcare

IWL
9.0%
IUSG
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWL
8.8%
IUSG
8.5%

Industrials

IWL
7.2%
IUSG
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

IWL
4.5%
IUSG
1.0%

Energy

IWL
2.7%
IUSG
0.2%

Utilities

IWL
1.7%
IUSG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IWL
1.3%
IUSG
0.5%

Real Estate

IWL
1.0%
IUSG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWL vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWL
IWL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWL vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWLIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.49

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

5.55

+2.16

IWL vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWL vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWLIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-63.41%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-13.07%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-22.28%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.65%

-32.21%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-32.35%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-4.25%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-21.33%

+17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.52%

-1.08%

Volatility

IWL vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 4.00%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWLIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

5.95%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

14.56%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

17.79%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

21.19%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

20.54%

-2.42%

IWL vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWL vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than IUSG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.50%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
0.85%0.90%1.04%1.30%1.54%1.12%1.30%1.96%1.93%1.69%1.96%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IWL and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to IWL (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.06% vs 15.89% for IWL. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IWL has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.06% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWL.

IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.

IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.04% for IUSG.

IWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWL and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer