IWL vs. FZALX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX).
IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. FZALX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
IWL vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWL vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | -4.96% | 19.09% | 27.12% | 29.77% | -19.89% | 27.79% | 22.10% | 31.42% | -3.30% | 22.90% |
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z | -2.10% | 27.07% | 26.13% | 26.63% | -8.89% | 26.44% | 13.06% | 31.25% | -7.31% | 18.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's -2.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWL having a 14.87% annualized return and FZALX not far ahead at 15.57%.
IWL
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
FZALX
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWL vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
FZALX
IWL vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWL | FZALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.10 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.26 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 10.48 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWL | FZALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.90 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and FZALX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWL vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than FZALX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.95% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z | 4.12% | 4.04% | 2.83% | 2.17% | 4.51% | 4.92% | 8.14% | 13.19% | 21.94% | 16.56% | 2.12% | 4.33% |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum FZALX drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and FZALX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | FZALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -35.23% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -12.17% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | -23.25% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | -35.23% | +2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -6.15% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -3.81% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.62% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IWL vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | FZALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 5.55% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 9.76% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 18.37% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 16.73% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 18.14% | -0.08% |