FZALX vs. GSIFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) and GSIFX (Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FZALX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while GSIFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, FZALX returned 16.39%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for GSIFX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FZALX charges 0.51%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for GSIFX.

Performance

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZALX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FZALX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 16.39%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.

FZALX

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 7.48%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: 22.95%
• 5Y*: 16.54%
• 10Y*: 16.39%
• ALL TIME*: 14.68%

GSIFX

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: 6.04%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 1Y: 17.32%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: 9.64%
• ALL TIME*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	10.77%	27.07%	26.13%	26.63%	-8.89%	26.44%	13.06%	31.25%	-7.31%	18.01%
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A	7.83%	25.51%	0.33%	15.44%	-17.69%	16.23%	22.89%	27.68%	-14.85%	25.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FZALX and GSIFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.76

The correlation between FZALX and GSIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZALX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZALX

FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GSIFX

GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FZALX	GSIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.01	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.48	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	1.31	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	5.06	+5.22

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZALX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZALX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZALX and GSIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZALX	GSIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.23%	-59.25%	+24.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-12.15%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-13.56%	-4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.25%	-31.94%	+8.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-35.00%	-0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-0.83%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-15.16%	+11.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	3.15%	-1.07%

Volatility

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) is 3.63%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that FZALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZALX	GSIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	4.43%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	13.15%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	15.89%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	17.00%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	17.12%	+0.98%

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZALX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZALX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

FZALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than GSIFX's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	3.64%	4.04%	2.83%	2.17%	4.51%	4.92%	8.14%	13.19%	21.94%	16.56%	2.12%	4.33%
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A	2.02%	2.18%	2.30%	1.37%	0.82%	6.29%	0.00%	1.67%	1.45%	1.25%	2.79%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZALX and GSIFX in my portfolio?

FZALX and GSIFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZALX or GSIFX?

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FZALX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZALX dropped -35.23% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.