PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FZALX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FZALX and FBGRX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FZALX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.03%
9.08%
FZALX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FZALX:

2.19

FBGRX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

FZALX:

2.96

FBGRX:

1.76

Omega Ratio

FZALX:

1.41

FBGRX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FZALX:

3.27

FBGRX:

1.78

Martin Ratio

FZALX:

13.51

FBGRX:

5.38

Ulcer Index

FZALX:

1.99%

FBGRX:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

FZALX:

12.27%

FBGRX:

20.85%

Max Drawdown

FZALX:

-42.95%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

FZALX:

-0.26%

FBGRX:

-0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZALX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FZALX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.06%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


FZALX

YTD

5.89%

1M

2.35%

6M

10.30%

1Y

25.06%

5Y*

13.60%

10Y*

7.06%

FBGRX

YTD

4.25%

1M

2.26%

6M

8.61%

1Y

25.31%

5Y*

14.56%

10Y*

13.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FZALX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZALX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FZALX: current value at 0.51% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.51%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FZALX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FZALX is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FZALX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FZALX is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FZALX is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FZALX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FZALX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FZALX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FZALX, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.191.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for FZALX, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.961.76
The chart of Omega ratio for FZALX, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.411.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for FZALX, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.271.78
The chart of Martin ratio for FZALX, currently valued at 13.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0013.515.38
FZALX
FBGRX

The current FZALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZALX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.19
1.29
FZALX
FBGRX

Dividends

FZALX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FZALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than FBGRX's 0.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
1.11%1.18%1.16%1.46%1.86%3.09%2.16%2.36%1.80%1.63%4.32%5.63%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.22%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FZALX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZALX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZALX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.26%
-0.64%
FZALX
FBGRX

Volatility

FZALX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) is 3.61%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FZALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.61%
6.43%
FZALX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab