IWFH vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

IWFH vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-7.41%	17.42%	-39.32%	-25.56%	6.99%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.73%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and GINN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.72

The correlation between IWFH and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWFH vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFH	GINN
Technology	43.2%	32.6%
Communication Services	31.6%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	12.7%
Healthcare	9.1%	20.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	1.8%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	12.4%
Industrials	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 31
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWFH	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.61	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.27%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.26%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.44%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.43%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.05%	—

IWFH vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.19%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFH and GINN in my portfolio?

IWFH and GINN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWFH or GINN?

On fees, IWFH is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or GINN?

IWFH is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

What is the main difference between IWFH and GINN?

IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.50% for GINN.