IWFH vs. ASMH
IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
IWFH vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IWFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 25.24%
- YTD
- 63.99%
- 6M
- 53.18%
- 1Y
- 130.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWFH vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 63.99% | 58.84% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFH vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
IWFH
ASMH
IWFH vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWFH | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 3.59 | — |
Drawdowns
IWFH vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFH | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.33% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility
IWFH vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFH | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.94% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 38.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 38.32% | — |
IWFH vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFH vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 0.99% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.83% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.
ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.
IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.19% for ASMH.
Find the right allocation for IWFH and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer