IWFH vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IWFH is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

IWFH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: 9.49%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	9.49%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-24.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-23.34%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	115.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	115.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	115.00%	—

IWFH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFH nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IWFH or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or ARMH?

IWFH and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IWFH and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.19% for ARMH.