PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFG vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWFG vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWFG vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
-13.11%14.33%37.56%38.40%3.75%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.82%8.29%6.67%10.07%1.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFG achieves a -13.11% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 1.82% return.


IWFG

1D
3.69%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-13.11%
6M
-13.01%
1Y
8.82%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10Y*

QAI

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.98%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWFG vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWFG vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFG
IWFG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IWFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFG vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFGQAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

1.41

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

1.99

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.31

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.93

-1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.39

8.93

-7.54

IWFG vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFG and QAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFGQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.41

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.51

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between IWFG and QAI is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IWFG vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

IWFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%5.44%1.01%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.48%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Drawdowns

IWFG vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and QAI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFGQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-14.95%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.20%

-5.43%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.25%

-2.51%

-14.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-2.60%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

1.17%

+5.08%

Volatility

IWFG vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 2.83%. This indicates that IWFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWFGQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

2.83%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

4.95%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

7.55%

+15.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

6.51%

+14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

6.12%

+14.57%