PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFG vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWFG vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWFG vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
-12.12%14.33%37.56%38.40%3.75%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
-3.70%17.46%24.88%26.84%1.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFG achieves a -12.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's -3.70% return.


IWFG

1D
1.14%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-12.12%
6M
-12.26%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHX

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.70%
6M
-1.70%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWFG vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWFG vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFG
IWFG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IWFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFG vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFGSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

0.98

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

1.50

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

1.51

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

7.02

-5.43

IWFG vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFG and SCHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFGSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.98

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.80

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between IWFG and SCHX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IWFG vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

IWFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%5.44%1.01%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.16%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Drawdowns

IWFG vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and SCHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFGSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-34.33%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.20%

-12.19%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.31%

-5.67%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-4.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

2.62%

+3.71%

Volatility

IWFG vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.36%. This indicates that IWFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWFGSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

5.36%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

9.67%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

18.33%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

17.13%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

18.13%

+2.56%