IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI
Compare and contrast key facts about NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI).
IWFG and CSNDX.MI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFG is an actively managed fund by New York Life. It was launched on Jun 23, 2022. CSNDX.MI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010.
Performance
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | -13.11% | 14.33% | 37.56% | 38.40% | 3.75% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.13% | 20.50% | 27.36% | 54.81% | -6.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
IWFG is traded in USD, while CSNDX.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSNDX.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWFG achieves a -13.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSNDX.MI's -8.13% return.
IWFG
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -13.11%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -4.52%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 18.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank
IWFG
CSNDX.MI
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWFG | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.15 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.71 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.84 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 7.23 | -5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWFG | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.15 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.92 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFG and CSNDX.MI is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWFG nor CSNDX.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.01% | 0.05% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and CSNDX.MI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFG | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -31.19% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.20% | -13.50% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.25% | -9.89% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -5.47% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.25% | 4.02% | +2.23% |
Volatility
IWFG vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) at 4.65%. This indicates that IWFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWFG | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 4.65% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.26% | 11.62% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 20.43% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 20.62% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 19.84% | +0.85% |