PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFG vs. PWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWFG vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWFG vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
-13.11%14.33%37.56%38.40%3.75%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
-0.93%24.94%31.04%30.61%1.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFG achieves a -13.11% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's -0.93% return.


IWFG

1D
3.69%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-13.11%
6M
-13.01%
1Y
8.82%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10Y*

PWB

1D
3.98%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.41%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWFG vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWFG vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFG
IWFG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IWFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFG vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFGPWBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

1.35

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

1.92

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.59

-2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.39

10.04

-8.65

IWFG vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFG and PWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFGPWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.35

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.55

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between IWFG and PWB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IWFG vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFG nor PWB has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%5.44%1.01%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%

Drawdowns

IWFG vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFG drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum PWB drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFG and PWB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFGPWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-52.58%

+30.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.20%

-12.11%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.25%

-8.61%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-8.29%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

3.12%

+3.13%

Volatility

IWFG vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) is 7.02%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that IWFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWFGPWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

7.98%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

15.16%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

23.23%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

20.96%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

20.58%

+0.11%