IWF vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IWF is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

IWF vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.82% return.

IWF

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 1.42%
• 6M: 3.78%
• YTD: 4.33%
• 1Y: 15.35%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

SPIT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 18.85%
• YTD: 27.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWF vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	4.33%	0.82%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	27.82%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IWF and SPIT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

IWF vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 28
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWF vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWF	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	—	—

Drawdowns

IWF vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWF	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.25%	-12.49%	-51.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-5.04%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.01%	-2.52%	-19.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWF	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.76%	26.32%	-9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.62%	26.32%	-4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	26.32%	-5.27%

IWF vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWF vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SPIT's 5.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.35%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.62%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWF and SPIT in my portfolio?

IWF and SPIT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWF or SPIT?

On fees, IWF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWF or SPIT?

IWF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWF or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.

What is the main difference between IWF and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWF and 0.89% for SPIT.