IWF vs. IBIT
IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWF returned 12.35% vs -43.69% for IBIT. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IWF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IWF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.17% return.
IWF
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.31%
IBIT
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -18.23%
- YTD
- -27.17%
- 1Y
- -43.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33B | $1.34B | $1.65B | |
| $458.24M | $549.09M | $635.49M |
IWF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 2.33% | 18.33% | 32.41% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.17% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWF and IBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IWF
IBIT
IWF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.82 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | -1.26 | +3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.25% | -53.30% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.27% | -53.30% | +37.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -49.28% | +43.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -18.29% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 34.80% | -29.34% |
Volatility
IWF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is 6.73%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that IWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 8.98% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 33.79% | -19.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 44.48% | -26.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 49.57% | -27.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 49.57% | -28.45% |
IWF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWF and IBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to IWF (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWF dropped -64.25% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, IWF leads with 12.35% vs -43.69% for IBIT. On fees, IWF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWF has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWF has performed better with a 12.35% return vs -43.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IWF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWF and 0.25% for IBIT.
IWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWF and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer