IWF vs. IBIT
IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWF returned 25.60% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IWF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IWF
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 24.80%
- 5Y*
- 15.24%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 7.11% | 18.33% | 32.23% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWF and IBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IWF
IBIT
IWF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | -0.79 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | -1.36 | +6.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | -0.89 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IWF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.25% | -49.36% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.27% | -49.36% | +33.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -48.10% | +46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -16.02% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 28.44% | -23.58% |
Volatility
IWF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is 3.61%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 9.50% | -5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 34.44% | -22.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 43.73% | -28.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 50.19% | -28.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 50.19% | -29.22% |
IWF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWF and IBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IWF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWF dropped -64.25% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IWF leads with 25.60% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IWF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWF has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWF has performed better with a 25.60% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IWF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWF and 0.25% for IBIT.
IWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWF and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer