PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIT vs. BITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIT vs. BITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBIT having a -26.49% return and BITB slightly higher at -26.47%.


IBIT

1D
2.47%
1M
-15.04%
YTD
-26.49%
6M
-27.13%
1Y
-37.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITB

1D
2.46%
1M
-15.00%
YTD
-26.47%
6M
-27.10%
1Y
-37.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. BITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-26.49%-6.41%89.87%
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
-26.47%-6.47%89.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and BITB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

1.00

The correlation between IBIT and BITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIT vs. BITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BITB
BITB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. BITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBITBITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.87

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.73

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.25

0.00

IBIT vs. BITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is comparable to the BITB Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and BITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. BITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, roughly equal to the maximum BITB drawdown of -52.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and BITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBITBITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.11%

-52.04%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.11%

-52.04%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.80%

-48.78%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-16.80%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.41%

30.39%

+0.02%

Volatility

IBIT vs. BITB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) have volatilities of 13.00% and 12.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBITBITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.00%

12.90%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.53%

34.47%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.29%

44.18%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.21%

50.00%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.21%

50.00%

+0.21%

IBIT vs. BITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BITB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIT vs. BITB - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBIT nor BITB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IBIT and BITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIT has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to BITB (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs BITB's -52.04%.

On 1-year performance, IBIT leads with -37.79% vs -37.80% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 12.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIT has performed better with a -37.79% return vs -37.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

IBIT and BITB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Both ETFs track CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bitwise Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.20% for BITB.

IBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIT and BITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer