IWF vs. IAU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).

IWF and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005. Both IWF and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IWF vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWF vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	-9.83%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	8.61%	63.95%	26.85%	12.84%	-0.63%	-4.00%	25.03%	17.98%	-1.76%	12.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IWF has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 16.53%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.08% annualized return.

IWF

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -5.20%
• YTD: -9.83%
• 6M: -8.80%
• 1Y: 18.54%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 16.53%

IAU

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: -11.01%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 21.15%
• 1Y: 49.53%
• 3Y*: 33.12%
• 5Y*: 21.78%
• 10Y*: 14.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWF vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IAU

iShares Gold Trust

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Return for Risk

IWF vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 51
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

IAU

IAU Risk / Return Rank: 87
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWF vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWF	IAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.80	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.24	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.33	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	2.69	-1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	9.97	-6.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWF vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWF and IAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWF	IAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.80	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	1.24	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.89	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.64	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between IWF and IAU is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IWF vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.40%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IWF vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and IAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWF	IAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.25%	-45.14%	-19.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.27%	-19.18%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-20.93%	-11.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	-21.82%	-10.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.12%	-13.20%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-15.98%	-6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.74%	5.18%	-0.44%

Volatility

IWF vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is 6.74%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that IWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWF	IAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	11.02%	-4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	24.11%	-11.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.40%	27.62%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.41%	17.69%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	15.82%	+5.10%