PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. PHYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -4.73% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's -6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 11.76%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


IAU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-4.73%
6M
-8.68%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
11.76%

PHYS

1D
-2.06%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
-6.30%
6M
-10.24%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
16.99%
10Y*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-4.73%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
-6.30%63.95%26.43%12.98%-1.81%-4.84%23.89%18.14%-2.64%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and PHYS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2010

0.94

The correlation between IAU and PHYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS
PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUPHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.79

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

2.11

+0.26

IAU vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and PHYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and PHYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUPHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-48.16%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-24.80%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-24.80%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-24.80%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-24.80%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.87%

-24.41%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-21.00%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

9.22%

-0.15%

Volatility

IAU vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) have volatilities of 8.10% and 8.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUPHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

8.13%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

25.01%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.38%

28.34%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

18.55%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.36%

-0.38%

Dividends

IAU vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IAU and PHYS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PHYS has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to IAU (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs PHYS's -48.16%.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and PHYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer