PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAU vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAU vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
121.87%
105.11%
IAU
PHYS

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IAU having a 23.93% return and PHYS slightly lower at 23.48%. Over the past 10 years, IAU has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 7.69%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.


IAU

YTD

23.93%

1M

-4.27%

6M

5.87%

1Y

28.99%

5Y (annualized)

11.62%

10Y (annualized)

7.69%

PHYS

YTD

23.48%

1M

-5.34%

6M

4.91%

1Y

27.15%

5Y (annualized)

10.82%

10Y (annualized)

7.12%

Key characteristics


IAUPHYS
Sharpe Ratio2.071.91
Sortino Ratio2.772.52
Omega Ratio1.361.33
Calmar Ratio3.753.05
Martin Ratio12.5311.01
Ulcer Index2.43%2.56%
Daily Std Dev14.74%14.71%
Max Drawdown-45.14%-48.16%
Current Drawdown-8.13%-9.19%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between IAU and PHYS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAU vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAU, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.071.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAU, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.772.52
The chart of Omega ratio for IAU, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.361.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAU, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.753.05
The chart of Martin ratio for IAU, currently valued at 12.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.5311.01
IAU
PHYS

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.07
1.91
IAU
PHYS

Dividends

IAU vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAU vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.13%
-9.19%
IAU
PHYS

Volatility

IAU vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.38%
5.55%
IAU
PHYS