PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWD vs. GVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWD vs. GVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWD having a 14.20% return and GVUS slightly higher at 14.24%.


IWD

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.22%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.76%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
11.23%

GVUS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.24%
6M
14.89%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWD vs. GVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.20%15.68%14.17%5.54%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
14.24%15.90%14.08%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IWD and GVUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.99

The correlation between IWD and GVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWD vs. GVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWD
GVUS

Financial Services

18.5%
19.2%

Technology

17.9%
15.0%

Industrials

12.7%
13.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
10.8%

Communication Services

8.2%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
7.1%

Energy

6.5%
6.9%

Utilities

4.1%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.8%

Financial Services

IWD
18.5%
GVUS
19.2%

Technology

IWD
17.9%
GVUS
15.0%

Industrials

IWD
12.7%
GVUS
13.1%

Healthcare

IWD
10.5%
GVUS
10.8%

Communication Services

IWD
8.2%
GVUS
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWD
7.0%
GVUS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWD
6.7%
GVUS
7.1%

Energy

IWD
6.5%
GVUS
6.9%

Utilities

IWD
4.1%
GVUS
4.3%

Real Estate

IWD
3.9%
GVUS
4.0%

Basic Materials

IWD
3.7%
GVUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWD vs. GVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWD vs. GVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDGVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

4.24

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

17.70

-0.24

IWD vs. GVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWD Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the GVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWD and GVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDGVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.55

-1.13

Drawdowns

IWD vs. GVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, which is greater than GVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and GVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDGVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.10%

-15.82%

-44.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-6.68%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-2.01%

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.60%

+0.02%

Volatility

IWD vs. GVUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) have volatilities of 2.90% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDGVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.01%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

8.14%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

10.86%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

13.28%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

13.28%

+4.01%

IWD vs. GVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GVUS's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWD vs. GVUS - Dividend Comparison

IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than GVUS's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.58%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.50%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IWD and GVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to IWD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs GVUS's -15.82%.

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.22% vs 28.16% for IWD. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 28.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWD.

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.50% for IWD.

IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.12% for GVUS.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWD and GVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer