PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWD vs. IWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWD vs. IWV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) and IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWD returned 11.61%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for IWV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWD charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWV.

Performance

IWD vs. IWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than IWV's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IWD has underperformed IWV with an annualized return of 11.61%, while IWV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.

IWD

1D
-1.06%
1M
2.28%
YTD
15.35%
6M
14.66%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.61%

IWV

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.48%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWD vs. IWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF		15.35%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		8.58%16.96%23.49%25.82%-19.28%25.54%20.55%30.66%-5.43%20.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IWD and IWV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000

0.92

The correlation between IWD and IWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (3 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWD vs. IWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWD
IWV

Technology

18.6%
36.5%

Financial Services

18.4%
11.5%

Industrials

12.5%
9.1%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.9%

Communication Services

8.1%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.3%

Energy

6.3%
3.3%

Utilities

4.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

3.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.7%
2.0%

Technology

IWD
18.6%
IWV
36.5%

Financial Services

IWD
18.4%
IWV
11.5%

Industrials

IWD
12.5%
IWV
9.1%

Healthcare

IWD
10.6%
IWV
8.9%

Communication Services

IWD
8.1%
IWV
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWD
7.1%
IWV
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

IWD
6.7%
IWV
4.3%

Energy

IWD
6.3%
IWV
3.3%

Utilities

IWD
4.0%
IWV
2.1%

Real Estate

IWD
3.9%
IWV
2.3%

Basic Materials

IWD
3.7%
IWV
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

Often compared with IWD:
IWD vs. IWFIWD vs. VTVIWD vs. IWBIWD vs. QQQIWD vs. VONVIWD vs. IWRIWD vs. EIMI.L
Often compared with IWV:
IWV vs. SPYIWV vs. VTIIWV vs. IWMIWV vs. ACWXIWV vs. VTHRIWV vs. IVVIWV vs. RSP

Return for Risk

IWD vs. IWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
IWV
IWV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWD vs. IWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IWDIWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.52
1.87

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.52
2.57

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.68

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.32

11.92

+5.39

IWD vs. IWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWD Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the IWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWD and IWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWD vs. IWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, which is greater than IWV's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and IWV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWDIWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.10%

-55.61%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-8.89%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-19.28%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-25.11%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-35.22%

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-2.74%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-10.57%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.99%

-0.36%

Volatility

IWD vs. IWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is 4.14%, while iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWDIWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.84%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

9.97%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

12.72%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

17.33%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

18.41%

-1.13%

IWD vs. IWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWD vs. IWV - Dividend Comparison

IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than IWV's 0.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF		1.45%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF		0.89%0.96%1.08%1.30%1.56%1.04%1.30%1.69%1.97%1.58%1.79%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWD and IWV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWV has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IWD (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs IWV's -55.61%.

On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.98% vs 11.61% for IWD. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.

IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.89% for IWV.

IWD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.20% for IWV.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWD and IWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer