IWD vs. IWB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB).
IWD and IWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both IWD and IWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWD or IWB.
Correlation
The correlation between IWD and IWB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWD vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWD:
1.33
IWB:
1.94
IWD:
1.90
IWB:
2.59
IWD:
1.24
IWB:
1.36
IWD:
1.95
IWB:
2.93
IWD:
7.69
IWB:
12.86
IWD:
1.91%
IWB:
1.92%
IWD:
11.05%
IWB:
12.71%
IWD:
-60.10%
IWB:
-55.38%
IWD:
-7.54%
IWB:
-4.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly lower than IWB's 23.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IWD has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 8.21%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.66% annualized return.
IWD
13.34%
-4.75%
6.51%
13.69%
8.42%
8.21%
IWB
23.71%
-0.69%
8.01%
23.81%
14.13%
12.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWD vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWD has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWD vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWD vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IWB's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 2.41% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 2.00% | 1.95% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
IWD vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, which is greater than IWB's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWD vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is 3.45%, while iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that IWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.