IVW vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index, while BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. IVW is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVW returned 15.93%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BATT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

IVW vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 26.16% return.

IVW

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.39%
• YTD: 13.68%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 33.77%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: 18.07%

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVW vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.68%	21.95%	35.82%	29.83%	-29.50%	31.80%	33.19%	30.77%	-9.07%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IVW and BATT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018	0.59

The correlation between IVW and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVW vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVW	BATT
Technology	49.3%	5.6%
Communication Services	18.0%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	18.9%
Financial Services	8.9%	0.0%
Industrials	6.2%	16.9%
Healthcare	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Utilities	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.4%	57.0%
Energy	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

IVW vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVW

IVW Risk / Return Rank: 57
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVW vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVW	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	3.38	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.69	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.50	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	6.12	-3.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	22.20	-12.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVW vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVW and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVW	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	3.38	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.12	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.01	+0.44

Drawdowns

IVW vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVW	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.33%	-69.38%	+12.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-17.03%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.15%	-47.65%	+25.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-61.98%	+29.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-3.44%	+2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.62%	-34.78%	+17.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	4.68%	-1.36%

Volatility

IVW vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is 4.30%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that IVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVW	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	10.29%	-5.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	24.67%	-12.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	30.80%	-14.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	29.57%	-8.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	30.60%	-9.98%

IVW vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVW vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than BATT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.35%	0.40%	0.43%	1.03%	0.92%	0.46%	0.82%	1.63%	1.28%	1.30%	1.51%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVW and BATT in my portfolio?

IVW and BATT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVW or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to IVW (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVW dropped -57.33% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, IVW or BATT?

On 5-year performance, IVW leads with 15.93% vs 3.45% for BATT. On fees, IVW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IVW has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVW or BATT?

Over the 5-year period, IVW has performed better with a 15.93% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVW or BATT?

IVW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BATT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVW or BATT?

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.

What is the main difference between IVW and BATT?

IVW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BATT is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVW and 0.59% for BATT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.